00:16:53


[Login]   
[Book List]  
 
Bidding Information
Lot #    10209
Auction End Date    4/19/2005 1:03:00 PM (mm/dd/yyyy)
          
Title Information
Title (English)    Matte Dan
Title (Hebrew)    מטה דן וכוזרי חלק שני
Author    [Polemic] R. David b. Pinehas Nieto
City    Metz
Publisher    Getshlik Speyer
Publication Date    1780
          
Collection Information
Independent Item    This listing is an independent item not part of any collection
          
Description Information
Physical
Description
   89 ff., 192:120 mm., usual age staining, nice margins, old hand on title, stamps. A very good copy bound in contemporary full leather boards, rubbed.
          
Detailed
Description
   Devoted to a defense of the Oral Law against the attacks of ex-Marranos to whom the rabbinic tradition was both novel and unacceptable. The work has frequently been reprinted as a defense of rabbinic Judaism (last edition: Jerusalem, 1958).

R. David b. Pinehas Nieto (1654–1728), philosopher and haham of the Spanish and Portuguese Synagogue in London (1701–28). Having studied medicine at the University of Padua, Nieto functioned as dayyan, preacher, and physician in Leghorn before going to London. He was proficient in languages and an astronomer of some repute. His calendar (1717) served the London community until the 19th century as a guide for the Sabbath and festivals. His works indicate that he was fully aware of the religious currents and crosscurrents of his time, including Spinozism, Deism, and Shabbateanism. Esh Dat (1715) was directed against the Shabbatean heresiarch, Nehemiah Hiyya Hayon, Previously, Nieto had published Pascalogia (1702), dealing with the date of the Christian Easter in relation to that of the Jewish Passover, and De La Divina Providencia (1704). The latter was an elaboration of a sermon Nieto had delivered to combat the deistic notion of a "Nature" apart from God. Nieto identified Nature with God; and, although he made it clear that he had natura naturans, and not natura naturata (see Spinoza) in mind, he was accused of Spinozistic leanings. Nevertheless, "Hakham Zevi" Ashkenazi (cf. his responsum no. 18) ruled in his favor. Nieto's Reply to the Archbishop of Cranganor, published posthumously in 1729, controverts the christological interpretation of the Bible. In his writings, Nieto gives evidence of wide reading in science and the humanities. He argues for the compatability of Judaism and scientific investigations. Nieto is also one of the very few Jewish theologians who used the argument de consensu gentium to establish the dogmas of God's existence and of retribution.

          
Paragraph 2    בשנת דן ידין עמו כאחד שבטי י'ש'ר'אלהסכמה (ניתנה לר' נטע מאיי'): ר' ארי' ליב [גינצבורג], מיץ, כו סיון תקל"ט.
          
Reference
Description
   Vinograd, Metz 44; CD-EPI 0152340; EJ; I. Solomons, David Nieto and Some of his Contemporaries (1931); A. M. Hyamson, Sephardim of England (1950), index; J. J. Petuchowski, Theology of Haham David Nieto (1954; 19702); D. Nieto, Ha-Kuzari ha-Sheni (1958), introd. by J. L. Maimon, 5–20, biography by C. Roth, 261–75.
        
Associated Images
3 Images (Click thumbnail to view full size image):
  Order   Image   Caption
  1   Click to view full size  
  
  2   Click to view full size  
  
  3   Click to view full size  
  
  
Listing Classification
Period
  
18th Century:    Checked
  
Location
France:    Checked
  
Subject
Polemics:    Checked
Other:    Philosophy
  
Characteristic
Language:    Hebrew
  
Manuscript Type
  
Kind of Judaica