She’elot u-Teshuvot Rashbash, R. Solomon Duran, Livorno 1742 (49327)

שאלות ותשובות הרשב"ש - First Edition

Bidding has ended on this item.

Your Listing Options

for more options
Status: Unsuccessful  
Content/listingImages/20190320/d2eb6a08-385f-4152-a5f7-fe201eb866b5_fullsize.jpg
Current Bid:  
Reserve Price Not Met  
Auction Ends: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 11:20:30 AM
Bid History: 5 Bids  
Page Views: 99  

Listing Details

Lot Number: 49327
Title (English): She’elot u-Teshuvot Rashbash
Title (Hebrew): שאלות ותשובות הרשב"ש
Note: First Edition
Author: R. Solomon Duran
City: Livorno
Publisher: Abraham Meldola
Publication Date: 1742
Estimated Price: $300.00 USD - $600.00 USD
Content/listingImages/20190320/d2eb6a08-385f-4152-a5f7-fe201eb866b5_fullsize.jpg Content/listingImages/20190320/7e67865d-f1ef-4eb0-bb36-57f80fd23101_fullsize.jpg

Description

Physical Description

First edition. [4], 2-140 ff., folio, 323:214 mm., usual light age and damp staining, wide margins, several old ownership inscriptions on title. A good copy loose in contemporary boards, rubbed, split, no spine..
 
Includes the Spanish page of approbations not present in all copies.
 

Detail Description

Responsa which deal not only with the legal matters but also with some philosophical problems and contain explanations of some biblical and talmudic passages.

R. Solomon b. Simeon Duran (known as RaShBaSh, Hebrew acronym of R. Shelomo ben Shimon; c. 1400–1467), North African rabbinical authority; son of R. Simeon b. Zemah Duran. He was born in Algiers, but no details are known of his youth. His education embraced not only rabbinical knowledge but also science, medicine, and philosophy. It appears from his responsa that he joined his father's bet din at an early age and was the head of the yeshivah. Some of his responsa were written during the lifetime of his father. His apologetical work Milhemet Mitzvah (1438) was written with his father's authorization. In it R. Solomon repulsed the accusations against the Talmud made by the apostate Joshua Lorki (Geronimo de Santa FM) and even made counterattacks against the Christian clergy. He showed that Lorki's accusation that the Talmud favored immorality was wrong, and on the contrary that it teaches a high standard of morality and chastity; and that it was the Christian clerical circles who indulged in immoral conduct to such an extent that it became known by the name "peccato dei frati." After defending the halakhic parts of the Talmud he proceeded to explain the aggadot attacked by Lorki. In Solomon's view (as expressed already by Jehiel b. Joseph of Paris and by Nahmanides in their disputations) they had no binding force.

In his youth he wrote a rhetorical epistle (melizah) to Nathan Najjar in Constantine (Rashbash, no. 259) using talmudic idioms, style, and language (the use of this kind of melizah is characteristic of him). His letter made a deep impression upon Najjar as can be seen from his reply in which the following passage occurs: "My son, my son, my heart was filled with anxiety for I said 'Who will sit on the throne of my master the rabbi, your father?'... Now, however, I know that Solomon, his son, will reign after him and will sit upon his throne" (cf. I Kings, 1:13, 17, 30). After his father's death Solomon was appointed rabbi of Algiers. He seems to have also been the head of a yeshivah and some of his pupils were mentioned by name. His religious and general outlook can be derived from his responsa. Thus when asked whether the dialogue of Balaam and his ass (Num. 22:28), Jacob's wrestling with the angel (Gen. 32:25), and the visit of the angels to Abraham (Gen. 18:1ff.) took place in reality or were dreams, his reply was that all were real events, as Nahmanides had already stated (Rashbash, no. 44). In responsum no. 3 he strongly criticized Haggai b. Alzuk in Mostaganem, who maintained that perfection of the soul could be achieved by perfection of the intellect and that aliyah to Erez Israel had no effect. In his view settling in Erez Israel is a great mitzvah, particularly as many religious commands concern only Erez Israel. With regard to the question whether the world will be destroyed or not, he showed that the Talmud and Nahmanides decided in the affirmative, while Maimonides' view was in the negative. Solomon thought that while the belief in creation ex nihilo is binding, belief in the ultimate destruction of the world is not; it is left to one's own discretion (responsum no. 436). Concerning the Kabbalah he said of himself (no. 36): "I am not one of its members" and expressed his indignation at the doctrine of the ten Sefirot (no. 188). His decisions were quoted by later authorities (including R. Joseph Caro and R. Moses Trani).

 

Hebrew Description

שאלות ותשובות ... אשר פעל ועשה ... ר' שלמה בן ... ר' שמעון בר צמח היה גנוז ... כמו שלש מאות שנה ... נמצא ... באוצרותיו של ... ר' מלאכי בכה"ר יעקב הכהן ...בשנת י'ה'י'ה' ל'ב'י'ת' י'ה'ו'ד'ה' לששון ולשמחה

דף א,א: תהלה לדוד; הלצה ששלח ... ר' דוד מילדולה ... ובה מספר בשבח הספר.

הסכמות: דייני ליוורנו: ר' דניאל ואלינטין, ר' דוד ב"ר אברהם מילדולה ור' יעקב לוסינה, צו תק"ב;
ר' מלאכי ב"ר יעקב הכהן, ראש-חודש המרוצה [אלול], תק"ב;
ר' רפאל עמנואל חי ב"ר אברהם ריקי, ליוורנו, ו בהעלותך תק"ב;
ר' דוד ישראל עטיאס ור' יצחק ן' דנא די בריטו, אמשטרדם, חקת, תק"ב;
ר' ארי' ליב [ב"ר שאול], אמשטרדם, כג תמוז תק"ב;
ר' רפאל ב"ר אלעזר מילדולה, באיונה, ח תמוז תק"א;
ר' יצחק ב"ר אשר פאציפיקו, ויניציאה, כי תבוא תק"ב;
ר' מנחם עזריה ב"ר יהודה מצליח פאדווה, פירינצי, ז אלול תק"ב.

 

References

Bibliography of the Hebrew Book 1470-1960 #000139377; EJ; Isaac Conforte, Kore ha-Dorot, p. 27b